.png)
Microdermabrasion vs hydrodermabrasion is one of the most common comparisons people make when choosing a facial in Melbourne.
Both promise smoother skin, clearer pores, and a brighter complexion.
Only one of them is usually the better choice for most skin types today.
This guide breaks down how each treatment works, who they’re best for, and which one actually delivers better results in real life.

Microdermabrasion is a mechanical exfoliation treatment.
It physically removes dead skin cells using abrasion.
How it works:
Microdermabrasion was considered advanced years ago.
Today, it’s effective but limited.
Hydrodermabrasion is a fluid-based exfoliation and infusion treatment.
It cleans, exfoliates, and hydrates at the same time.
How it works:
It focuses on clearing and supporting the skin barrier, not scraping it.
The difference comes down to how exfoliation happens.
One removes.
The other removes and replenishes.
That distinction matters more than marketing claims.
Microdermabrasion works best for:
It is not ideal for:
Friction can aggravate compromised barriers.
Hydrodermabrasion suits a wider range of people.
It works well for:
That’s why it’s become more popular across Melbourne clinics.
Results fade quickly unless repeated often.
Results are usually more balanced and longer lasting.
Downtime matters more than people expect.
Microdermabrasion
Hydrodermabrasion
For working professionals, hydrodermabrasion is easier to schedule.
This is where opinions shift quickly.
Discomfort is not a sign of effectiveness.
Comfort matters for consistency.
Hydrodermabrasion is generally the safer choice.
Why:
Microdermabrasion can spread bacteria or worsen inflammation if acne is active.
Hydrodermabrasion usually wins here too.
It supports:
Microdermabrasion improves texture but doesn’t address dehydration well.
Typical recommendations:
Overdoing either can damage the skin barrier.
Prices vary, but patterns are clear.
The extra cost usually reflects:
Cheaper is not always better value.
This is happening quietly.
Reasons include:
Microdermabrasion isn’t bad.
It’s just no longer the best default.
Both can be paired with:
Hydrodermabrasion integrates more easily without stressing the skin.
Long-term skin improvement depends on:
Hydrodermabrasion supports all three better.
Avoid these:
No exfoliation treatment replaces a routine.
Ask yourself:
If unsure, hydrodermabrasion is the safer starting point.
If you’re comparing treatments, these help:
Which is safer
Hydrodermabrasion for most skin types.
Which is better for sensitive skin
Hydrodermabrasion.
Does microdermabrasion damage skin
It can if overused.
Is hydrodermabrasion worth the extra cost
Usually, yes.
Which gives better glow
Hydrodermabrasion.
Can men get both treatments
Yes.
Is either painful
Hydrodermabrasion is more comfortable.
Which has less downtime
Hydrodermabrasion.
Can acne-prone skin use microdermabrasion
With caution.
Which is more modern
Hydrodermabrasion.
When comparing microdermabrasion vs hydrodermabrasion, the answer is clear for most people.
Hydrodermabrasion delivers similar exfoliation with better hydration, lower irritation, and broader skin benefits.
Microdermabrasion still has a place, but it’s no longer the default choice.
Book your visit at your preferred Lotik location from here.